Module 3 · Lesson 16 of 17

Establishing an evidence-based project goal

← Back to moduleBack to academy

Learning objectives

  • Refine Define targets against validated Measure evidence.
  • Distinguish entitlement, benchmark and technical limit.
  • Set guardrails and revise expected benefits.

Evidence-based goal setting

Once the baseline is trusted, compare it to the best demonstrated subgroup, technical entitlement and any external benchmark. The goal should be achievable, defensible and time-bound.

Recalculate the benefit case whenever the baseline moves; a charter target must not survive against contrary evidence.

Garment-factory example

Best stable lines run at 3.2 DHU while the project line averages 8.5. A staged target of 4.0 within 12 weeks is supported; a ‘zero defect’ claim is not.

Method

  1. Validate the baseline.
  2. Estimate the gap and entitlement.
  3. Model the benefit under the new target.
  4. Agree guardrails so other CTQs are not damaged.

Common mistakes

  • Keeping a charter target after data disprove it.
  • Choosing a target only because leadership prefers a round number.

Knowledge check

Pick one answer per question. Explanations appear after you submit.

  1. 1. Entitlement is:

  2. 2. A charter target that contradicts baseline evidence should be:

Author: Sanjeewa Dehiwalage · Last reviewed: 2026-07-21

Stay in touch

New chapters, delivered quietly.

A short note when a new story, reflection or milestone is added. No noise, no spam — unsubscribe with a single click.