Module 11 · Lesson 11 of 13
Peer/self-review rubric
Learning objectives
- Score a project against ten evidence-based dimensions.
- Cite evidence for every rating.
- Block readiness on critical safety, integrity or measurement failures.
Dimensions
- Problem, CTQ and scope
- Stakeholder and ethics
- Measurement and data
- Analytical validity
- Cause confirmation
- Solution, pilot and risk
- Control and sustainment
- Benefits
- Communication
- Reflection
Rating scale
- 0 missing
- 1 weak or unsupported
- 2 adequate with gaps
- 3 strong and traceable
- Critical safety, integrity or measurement failures block readiness regardless of total
Copy-friendly rubric template
- One row per dimension
- Reviewer cites evidence and question for every rating
- Owner accepts or revises with rationale
- Rescore only after visible correction
Garment-factory example
A reviewer challenges whether improved FTR came from the new process or a tightened inspection rule and whether output and repair guardrails held; the owner supplies stratified charts before rescoring.
Method
- Score with citations, not opinion.
- Use the rubric for readiness, not personal judgement.
- Never average away a critical failure.
Common mistakes
- Generous scores without citations.
- Averaging across dimensions to hide critical gaps.
- Rescoring without visible correction.
Knowledge check
Pick one answer per question. Explanations appear after you submit.
1. A critical measurement failure:
2. A rating is credible when:
Author: Sanjeewa Dehiwalage · Last reviewed: 2026-07-21