Module 11 · Lesson 5 of 13
Analyze submission pack
Learning objectives
- Assemble an Analyze submission pack that confirms vital causes.
- Combine process-door and data-door evidence.
- Reject Pareto height or p<0.05 as sole root-cause proof.
Required evidence
- Cause inventory from process-door and data-door
- Fishbone and Five Whys
- C&E matrix and process FMEA
- Stratified graphs
- Appropriate tests or models with assumption checks
- Effect sizes and confidence intervals
- Mechanism narrative and confirmed vital-X table
Copy-friendly Analyze pack checklist
- Each candidate cause has an evidence question
- Alternatives and confounders tested
- Findings triangulated across sources
- Causes classified: confirmed / unsupported / inconclusive
- Vital X list has temporal logic and credible mechanism
Garment-factory example
A seam-damage analysis considers fabric lot, needle type/life, SPI, machine model, method, shift and inspector. After stratification and paired tests, needle life and SPI are confirmed as vital Xs; machine model is unsupported.
Method
- Link every candidate cause to a specific question.
- Test alternatives before naming a root cause.
- Publish the inconclusive list, not only the confirmed one.
Common mistakes
- Treating the tallest Pareto bar as the root cause.
- Data mining without process logic.
- Designing solutions before confirmation.
Knowledge check
Pick one answer per question. Explanations appear after you submit.
1. A confirmed vital X requires:
2. Inconclusive causes should be:
Author: Sanjeewa Dehiwalage · Last reviewed: 2026-07-21