Module 4 · Lesson 4 of 22

Five Whys and cause validation

← Back to moduleBack to academy

Learning objectives

  • Trace a causal chain from event to controllable system cause.
  • Ask mechanism-focused ‘why’ questions.
  • Validate each link with evidence.

Five Whys done well

The number five is flexible. Each ‘why’ answer must be specific, observable and supported by records, experiment or direct observation.

Branch when the evidence supports multiple contributing causes; a single chain rarely explains a real defect.

Garment-factory example

Broken stitches → needle damage → missed replacement interval → no cycle-based standard → no ownership or visual trigger. Each link is confirmed by needle-change logs and gemba observation.

Method

  1. Start from the specific event.
  2. Ask why it occurred and record evidence.
  3. Branch when multiple causes appear.
  4. Stop at a controllable system cause, not blame.

Common mistakes

  • Ending with ‘carelessness’.
  • Forcing one linear chain when several exist.

Knowledge check

Pick one answer per question. Explanations appear after you submit.

  1. 1. A Five Whys link is credible only when:

  2. 2. Ending with ‘operator carelessness’ is:

Author: Sanjeewa Dehiwalage · Last reviewed: 2026-07-21

Stay in touch

New chapters, delivered quietly.

A short note when a new story, reflection or milestone is added. No noise, no spam — unsubscribe with a single click.