Module 9 · Lesson 8 of 22
Statistical versus practical significance
Learning objectives
- Distinguish statistical significance from practical significance.
- Predefine a minimum important difference for garment work.
- Report effect, CI, p-value and decision together.
Core idea
A small p-value only says the observed data are unlikely under H0. Whether the effect matters depends on tolerance, cost, capacity and customer risk.
Decision method
- Before analysis, state the minimum important difference (MID).
- After analysis, report point estimate, CI and p-value with units.
- Compare CI limits with MID, not p with alpha alone.
- Nonsignificance is not proof of equality; check the CI width.
Garment-factory example
A 0.05 cm mean chest-width shift is statistically significant on n = 2,000 but sits well inside a ±1.0 cm tolerance — practically irrelevant. A 3-point FPY gain (72 → 75%) with CI (1.4, 4.6) saves real repair cost and is practically material.
Method
- Define MID up front.
- Compute effect + CI + p.
- State statistical and practical conclusions separately.
Common mistakes
- Reporting only p without effect size.
- Treating p > 0.05 as proof of no difference.
Knowledge check
Pick one answer per question. Explanations appear after you submit.
1. A statistically significant 0.05 cm shift lies well inside a ±1.0 cm tolerance. The result is:
2. Which statement is correct?
Author: Sanjeewa Dehiwalage · Last reviewed: 2026-07-21