Module 9 · Lesson 8 of 22

Statistical versus practical significance

← Back to moduleBack to academy

Learning objectives

  • Distinguish statistical significance from practical significance.
  • Predefine a minimum important difference for garment work.
  • Report effect, CI, p-value and decision together.

Core idea

A small p-value only says the observed data are unlikely under H0. Whether the effect matters depends on tolerance, cost, capacity and customer risk.

Decision method

  • Before analysis, state the minimum important difference (MID).
  • After analysis, report point estimate, CI and p-value with units.
  • Compare CI limits with MID, not p with alpha alone.
  • Nonsignificance is not proof of equality; check the CI width.

Garment-factory example

A 0.05 cm mean chest-width shift is statistically significant on n = 2,000 but sits well inside a ±1.0 cm tolerance — practically irrelevant. A 3-point FPY gain (72 → 75%) with CI (1.4, 4.6) saves real repair cost and is practically material.

Method

  1. Define MID up front.
  2. Compute effect + CI + p.
  3. State statistical and practical conclusions separately.

Common mistakes

  • Reporting only p without effect size.
  • Treating p > 0.05 as proof of no difference.

Knowledge check

Pick one answer per question. Explanations appear after you submit.

  1. 1. A statistically significant 0.05 cm shift lies well inside a ±1.0 cm tolerance. The result is:

  2. 2. Which statement is correct?

Author: Sanjeewa Dehiwalage · Last reviewed: 2026-07-21

Stay in touch

New chapters, delivered quietly.

A short note when a new story, reflection or milestone is added. No noise, no spam — unsubscribe with a single click.