Module 12 · Lesson 4 of 14

Analyze module quiz

← Back to moduleBack to academy

Learning objectives

  • Test Analyze reasoning against garment scenarios.
  • Choose the right test for the right data.
  • Distinguish statistical from practical significance.

Coverage

  • Process/data doors
  • Cause tools
  • FMEA/RPN
  • Stratified graphs
  • Hypothesis testing
  • Regression/ANOVA/chi-square
  • Effect vs p-value

Garment-factory example

A study shows a correlation between line supervisor tenure and DHU; the correction is to check for confounding factors before claiming cause.

Knowledge check

Pick one answer per question. Explanations appear after you submit.

  1. 1. Correlation ≠ causation because:

  2. 2. Two-way ANOVA is used when:

  3. 3. Chi-square association tests:

  4. 4. RPN uses:

  5. 5. P = 0.03, mean diff = 0.05 mm on ±3 mm tolerance:

  6. 6. A histogram of seam strength shows two peaks. Best move:

  7. 7. Before/after data on the same 30 garments is analysed with:

  8. 8. A cause is confirmed when:

  9. 9. Simple linear regression R² = 0.85 on shrinkage vs cycle time means:

  10. 10. You suspect measurement error inflates variation. Correct pre-analysis step:

Author: Sanjeewa Dehiwalage · Last reviewed: 2026-07-21

Stay in touch

New chapters, delivered quietly.

A short note when a new story, reflection or milestone is added. No noise, no spam — unsubscribe with a single click.