Module 4 · Lesson 1 of 22

Analyze-phase strategy and evidence hierarchy

← Back to moduleBack to academy

Learning objectives

  • State the intent of Analyze in one sentence.
  • Sequence process-door and data-door evidence.
  • Set an evidence hierarchy for cause claims.

What Analyze must deliver

Analyze converts hypotheses into confirmed root causes. Every cause must be observable, testable and controllable before it becomes a candidate for Improve.

The evidence hierarchy runs from anecdote → stratified data → statistical test → replicated experiment or removal/reappearance evidence.

Garment-factory example

A puckering hypothesis is downgraded from ‘folder alignment’ (anecdote) to ‘folder alignment on fabric construction X above speed Y’ once stratified data and a small test confirm the mechanism.

Method

  1. Restate the Y and known baseline.
  2. List candidate Xs with source (process-door or data-door).
  3. Plan tests that could disprove each cause.
  4. Rank surviving Xs by strength of evidence.

Common mistakes

  • Skipping to solutions before causes are confirmed.
  • Accepting seniority as evidence.

Knowledge check

Pick one answer per question. Explanations appear after you submit.

  1. 1. A root cause must be:

  2. 2. In the evidence hierarchy, replicated experiment ranks:

Author: Sanjeewa Dehiwalage · Last reviewed: 2026-07-21

Stay in touch

New chapters, delivered quietly.

A short note when a new story, reflection or milestone is added. No noise, no spam — unsubscribe with a single click.